Tibetet Segítő Társaság Sambhala Tibet Központ
Tibet Support Association Sambhala Tibet Center

székhely / telephely H-Budapest I. Attila út 123..
(00-36) 70 431 9343   (00-36)70 944 0260   (06-1)782 7721
sambhala@tibet.hu   www.tibet.hu   tibetpress.info
Facebook/Sambhala Tibet Központ   Facebook/Tibett Segítő Társaság
MagnetBank/ 16200010-00110240
IBAN/HU94 16200010 00110240 00000000 SWIFT/HBWEHUHB
(1%) adószám/ 18061347-1-41
nyitva tartás/hétköznap 12.00-20.00 hétvégén előadás függő

Közreműködő Bank
Közreműködő Bank

Dawa Tsering és Tempa Yarpel tisztázta álláspontját a viharos parlamenti ülés után

2017. szeptember 28./Phayul.com/TibetPress

Jelenleg csak angolul olvasható. Magyarul később.

eredeti cikk

By Tenzin Dharpo

DHARAMSHALA, Sept. 29: The Tibetan parliament in exile’s fourth session that concluded yesterday on a rather meek fashion, in contrast to its proceedings that saw the house disrupted and adjourned by legislators who deemed it necessary to disapprove against a statements made by one of its member.

In the eye of the storm, the storm which many say is far from what the forum it is intended for, are the two Tibetan member of Parliament Dawa Tsering who was accused of corruption by fellow MP Tenpa Yarphel. The latter’s statement that the private office of the Tibetan leader His Holiness the Dalai Lama was publicly endorsing the corruption-accused, escalated into majority of the MP’s walking out and the house unable to proceed.

MP Tenpa Yarphel later withdrew his statement after the Dalai Lama office clarified that the “Songtsen Award’ given to MP Dawa Tsering was not associated with them and that the official belonging to the Dalai Lama office who attended the function had done so in his personal capacity.

The developments have since become a talking point in the exile Tibetan community, with many saying that the statements made were derogatory towards the Dalai Lama. MP Tenpa Yarphel told Phayul that his remarks “served as a clarification to the Tibetan people that the Dalai Lama office did not felicitate the corrupt MP. This will further embolden the Tibetan people’s faith in the Dalai Lama’s office. I consider it as a much needed clarity to the masses on the issue.”

He also added that he feels there is “no cause for apologies” on the matter as suggested by some Tibetan netizens and fellow MP as he had already withdrawn the statement. “Whatever the Karmapa Rinpoche (Ogyen Trinley Dorje) has written in the statement, I see it as a parent advising their child and it is my duty to follow what he has said,” he commented on the recent statement by Karmapa Ogyen Trinley Dorje who said in a video message posted on Facebook that MP Yarphel’s statements were improper.

The other concerned MP Dawa Tsering said that the accusations are a manifestation of ulterior motives and is not directed towards anti-corruption but him. On the Yongling School issue he told Phayul that Yongling School and the land on which the school is built upon are two separate issues.

As far as the jurisdiction of the school is concerned, he and the school administration are willing to hand it over to the Department of Education under the Central Tibetan Administration and that he has approached the CTA for the school to be registered under the Tibetan administration. But the land is not registered under CTA; the land deed is under the name of a native here and not him, he said. “I do not own the land; legally I have the ‘general power of attorney’ which means I can oversee how the land can be used, whether developmental or commercial,” MP Tsering said.

He said that the Tibetan Justice Commission does not have jurisdiction on property disputes. “The Tibetan Justice Commission as per the charter cannot and does not hear dispute on property ownership. The trial that happened was not regarding who owns the land in the first place,” he told Phayul.

The case against Dawa Tsering was first filed in 2001 by Passang Tsewang accusing the former of claiming ownership of the school and running it as his private business, at the Tibetan Supreme Justice Commission which ruled in 2004 that the school belonged to the Tibetan Community. The same year, Dawa Tsering filed a defamation case in Indian High Court in Shimla in 2004.

The High Court transferred the case to the District Court in Dharamshala. In 2011, the Indian court ruled that Dawa Tsering, the plaintiff, had no right to possess and manage the school property, as it belonged to the Tibetan community, according to Tibet Sun.

 

Hozzászólások

Új hozzászólás

Név:

Hozzászólás:
Webgalamb